Global Solutions & Outreach Programs: Humanity’s best chance to resolve global warming, Part 1: Global warming challenges
Keywords:
global warming; climate change; climate solutions; human bias; wicked problems; business-as-usual; collaboration; mineral limitsAbstract
In June 2024, the world’s largest standalone public opinion poll covering 77 countries, Peoples’ Climate Vote 2024, reported that “89% of people [want] to see more climate action from their governments”. That is all well and good. However, how are policymakers being informed on the viability of climate solutions? Policymakers are typically not engineers or scientists. They must rely on others for advice. Many who provide that advice are influenced by four types of bias: Corporate vested interests, career vested interests, public passions, and political agendas. In combination with business-as-usual, these biases are destroying humanity’s chances of resolving global warming. They are detrimentally affecting current global projects to resolve global warming. To mitigate these biases, the Global Solutions and Outreach Programs (GSOP) proposal will be undertaken by multiple teams of engineers, economists, social experts, and policy experts within each country, using a Wicked-Problem Approach. This work will be done outside of, yet informing, governments, the marketplace, and public opinion. Country action plans will be rolled up to regional and global levels. The GSOP work will be iterated until the global action plan provides a resolution of global warming at the scale of Earth. Part 1 describes the challenges we face and a problem-solving approach to resolving it. Part 2 will describe our GSOP proposal using that approach.
References
[1]Rittel HWJ, Webber MM. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences. 1973; 4: 155–169.
[2]Hutchinson RW, English SL, Mughal MA. A general problem solving approach for wicked problems: Theory and application to chemical weapons verification and biological terrorism. Group Decision and Negotiation. 2002; 11: 257–279.
[3]Tomkinson B, Engel C, Tomkinson R. Dealing with wicked global problems: An inter-disciplinary approach. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching. 2009; 2.
[4]Levin K, Cashore B, Bernstein S, Auld G. Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: Constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences. 2012; 45: 123–152.
[5]Edmondson AC. Wicked-Problem Solvers: Lessons from successful cross-industry teams. Harvard Business Review. 2016.
[6]Hutchinson D, Smith Jr. D. People’s Assessment of Global Warming, Plus Adaptations for Advancement and Survival. Self published with Amazon; 2019.
[7]Bentley J, Toth M. Exploring Wicked Problems: What they are and why they are important. Archway Publishing; 2020.
[8]DiPerna P. Pricing the Priceless. John Wiley & Sons; 2023.
[9]Energy Transitions Commission. Fossil fuels in transition: Committing to the phase-down of all fossil fuels. Available online: https://www.energy-transitions.org/publications/fossil-fuels-in-transition/ (accessed on 2 February 2025).
[10]United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, adopted May 9, 1992, entered into force March 21, 1994, 1771 U.N.T.S. 107.
[11]Paris Agreement, Dec. 12, 2015, T.I.A.S. No. 16-1104.
[12]National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). Climate Conversations: COP28. Available online: https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/41711_01-2024_climate-conversations-cop28 (accessed on 2 February 2025).
[13]C, Waisman H, Colombier M, Segafredo L, Williams J. The Deep Decarbonization Pathways Project (DDPP): insights and emerging issues. Taylor & Francis. Vol. 16, No. S1, S1-S6, DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2016.1179620
[14]Statista Research Department. Global crude oil demand 2005–2024. Statista Research Department; 2024.
[15]Krumdieck S. Transition Engineering: Building a Sustainable Future. CRC Press; 2020.
[16]International Energy Agency. (2024). Oil 2024: Analysis and Forecast to 2030. IEA Publications, June 2024.
[17]Hawken P. Drawdown: The Most Comprehensive Plan Ever Proposed to Reverse Global Warming. Penguin Books; 2017.
[18]International Energy Agency (IEA). (2021). Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector. Paris: IEA.
[19]Installed electricity capacity worldwide in 2023, by source (in gigawatts). EIA©Statista 2025
[20]International Energy Agency (IEA). (2023). Renewables 2023: Analysis and forecasts to 2028. Paris: IEA.
[21]International Energy Agency (IEA). (2021). The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions. Paris: IEA.
[22]Shannak S, Cochrane L, Bobarykina D. Global uranium market dynamics: analysis and future implications. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, Volume 44, 31 Jan 2025.
[23]Michaux, S.P. 2023 Feb. Material Supply Challenges for the Green Transition to Phase out Fossil Fuels. SEB’s The Green Bond report: Raised forecasts for transition investment. Page 11.
[24]Haine A. McKinsey: Net-zero transition will cost $275 trillion globally by 2050. The National; 2022.
[25]Mathews J, Kidney S. Climate bonds: mobilizing financing for carbon management. Carbon Management, 1:1, 9-13, DOI: 10.4155/cmt.10.15
[26]United Nations Press Release. Secretary-General Urges Protecting, Restoring Degraded Land in Message for World Day to Combat Desertification. SG/SM/19621-ENV/DEV/1960-OBV/1889 12June2019.
[27]Scharping S. Agricultural lands are losing topsoil—Here’s how bad it could get. Eos; 2024.
[28]Charles D. New evidence shows fertile soil gone from midwestern farms. NPR; 2021.
[29]Masterson V. What is regenerative agriculture? World Economic Forum; 2022.
[30]Holmgren D. Permaculture: Principles & Pathways Beyond Sustainability. Holmgren Design Services, 2002. ISBN 0-6464-1844-0
[31]Hodapp D, Roca I, et al. Climate change disrupts core habitats of marine species. Global Change Biology, Volume 29, Issue 12, June 2023, pages 3304-3317. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16612
[32]Gramling C. Will stashing more CO2 in the ocean help slow climate change? ScienceNews; 2024.
[33]Sario A. Biodiversity Loss and Ecosystem Collapse: A Global Assessment Through 15 National Case Studies. Copyright ©2025 by Azhar ul Haque Sario.
[34]Lindwall C. Climate tipping points are closer than once thought. NRDC; 2022.
[35]Senge PM. The Fifth Discipline, The Ard & Practice of the Learning Organization. Doubleday; 1990.
[36]Steve, H.D., Nelson, R. Cook, D.C. (2007) Adaptive Governance: An Introduction and Implications for Public Policy (No. 10440). Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


