Micro(nano)plastics cycle in ruminant farming systems

Authors

  • Gerardo Grasso Institute for the Study of Nanostructured Materials, Sapienza Unit, Italian National Research Council, 00185 Rome, Italy Author
  • Sabrina Foglia Institute for the Study of Nanostructured Materials, Sapienza Unit, Italian National Research Council, 00185 Rome, Italy Author
  • Daniela Zane Institute for the Study of Nanostructured Materials, Sapienza Unit, Italian National Research Council, 00185 Rome, Italy Author
  • Bruno Brunetti Institute for the Study of Nanostructured Materials, Sapienza Unit, Italian National Research Council, 00185 Rome, Italy Author
  • Roberto Dragone Institute for the Study of Nanostructured Materials, Sapienza Unit, Italian National Research Council, 00185 Rome, Italy Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65746/pec63

Keywords:

microplastics; nanoplastics; Planetary Health; soil; ruminants; milk

Abstract

Plastic manufacturing is growing at a faster pace than the majority of synthetic substances. Upon release, plastic materials degrade into smaller fragments known as microplastics or nanoplastics, depending on their size. Addressing micro(nano)plastics pollution necessitates a comprehensive, collaborative approach within the Planetary Health framework. This approach acknowledges the interconnectedness of environmental compartments, global animal and human health, emphasizing a nuanced understanding of micro(nano)plastics’ movements and impacts on ecosystems. Our review investigates the pathways of micro(nano)plastics contamination within ruminant farming systems, evaluating their impacts on both biotic and abiotic components. We highlight the pervasiveness of plastic contaminants in all environmental compartments of ruminant farming systems, affecting biota, soil properties, and ecosystem services. These contaminants may be transferred to the human food chain through the consumption of animal-derived foods, raising potential health concerns for animals and human beings. Additionally, these contaminants may act as carriers for various chemical and biological environmental pollutants. Despite ongoing research, the cycle of these pollutants in ruminant farming systems remains fragmented and complex. Future efforts should apply the Planetary Health holistic approach to develop effective monitoring, mitigation, and management strategies.

References

1. Geyer R, Jambeck JR, Law KL. Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Science Advances. 2017; 3(7). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1700782

2. Microplastics and nanoplastics in food—an emerging issue. Available online: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/press/news/160623 (accessed on 1 February 2025).

3. Bank MS, Hansson SV. The plastic cycle: A novel and holistic paradigm for the Anthropocene. Environmental Science & Technology. 2019; 53(13): 7177–7179. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b02942

4. Waldschläger K, Lechthaler S, Stauch G, et al. The way of microplastic through the environment—Application of the source-pathway-receptor model. Science of The Total Environment. 2020; 713: 136584. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136584

5. Hoellein TJ, Rochman CM. The “plastic cycle”: A watershed‐scale model of plastic pools and fluxes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2021; 19(3): 176–183. doi: 10.1002/fee.2307

6. Horton R, Beaglehole R, Bonita R, et al. From public to planetary health: A manifesto. The Lancet. 2014; 383(9920): 847. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60409-8

7. Perin L, Dumas P, Vigne M. Representing cattle farming around the world: A conceptual and holistic framework for environmental and economic impact assessment. Ruminants. 2022; 2(4): 360–381. doi: 10.3390/ruminants2040025

8. The classification of world livestock production systems. A study prepared for the Animal Production and Health Division, FAO, AGA/MISC/80/3, Rome; 1980. Available online: https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/15cb8917-378c-40ef-9aab-9684def0e84c/content. (accessed on 11 June 2025).

9. Vendramini JMB, Silveira MLA, Dubeux Jr JCB, Sollenberger LE. Environmental impacts and nutrient recycling on pastures grazed by cattle. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 2007; 36: 139–149. doi: 10.1590/S1516-35982007001000015

10. Agga GE, Raboisson D, Walch L, et al. Epidemiological survey of peste des petits ruminants in Ethiopia: Cattle as potential sentinel for surveillance. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2019; 6. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00302

11. Frazzoli C, Bocca B, Mantovani A. The one health perspective in trace elements biomonitoring. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health. 2015; 18(7–8): 344–370. doi: 10.1080/10937404.2015.1097262.

12. Prata JC, da Costa JP, Lopes I, et al. A One Health perspective of the impacts of microplastics on animal, human and environmental health. Science of The Total Environment. 2021; 777: 146094. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146094

13. Rillig MC, Kim SW, Zhu YG. The soil plastisphere. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2023; 22: 1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41579-023-00967-2

14. Pelamatti T, Cardelli LR, Rios-Mendoza LM. The role of microplastics in bioaccumulation of pollutants. In: Rocha-Santos T, Costa M, Mouneyrac C (editors). Handbook of Microplastics in the Environment. Springer International Publishing; 2022. pp. 667–696.

15. Jaafarzadeh N, Talepour N. Microplastics as carriers of antibiotic resistance genes and pathogens in municipal solid waste (MSW) landfill leachate and soil: A review. Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering. 2023; 22(1): 1–12.

16. Dris R, Gasperi J, Mirande C, et al. A first overview of textile fibers, including microplastics, in indoor and outdoor environments. Environmental Pollution. 2017; 221: 453–458.

17. Ren S, Wang K, Zhang J, et al. Potential sources and occurrence of macro-plastics and microplastics pollution in farmland soils: A typical case of China. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. 2023; 54(7): 533–556.

18. Katsumi N, Kusube T, Nagao S, Okochi H. Accumulation of microcapsules derived from coated fertilizer in paddy fields. Chemosphere. 2021; 267: 129185. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129185

19. Pérez-Reverón R, González-Sálamo J, Hernández-Sánchez C, et al. Recycled wastewater as a potential source of microplastics in irrigated soils from an arid-insular territory (Fuerteventura, Spain). Science of The Total Environment. 2022; 817: 152830.

20. McConnell DJ, Dillon JL. Farm Management for Asia: A Systems Approach. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 1997.

21. Thomton PK. Livestock production: Recent trends, future prospects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 2010; 365: 2853–2867. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0134

22. Fresco LO. Farming systems analysis, an introduction. Wageningen Agricultural University; 1988.

23. Hurley RR, Nizzetto L. Fate and occurrence of micro(nano)plastics in soils: Knowledge gaps and possible risks. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health. 2018; 1: 6–11.

24. Lofty J, Muhawenimana V, Wilson CAME, Ouro P. Microplastics removal from a primary settler tank in a wastewater treatment plant and estimations of contamination onto European agricultural land via sewage sludge recycling. Environmental Pollution. 2022; 304: 119198. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119198

25. Kumar R, Sharma P. Recent Developments in Extraction, Identification, and Quantification of Microplastics from Agricultural Soil and Groundwater. In: Fate and Transport of Subsurface Pollutants, 7th ed. Springer; 2021. pp. 125–143.

26. Rodríguez-Seijo A, Pereira R. Microplastics in Agricultural Soils: Are they a Real Environmental Hazard? In: Bioremediation of Agricultural Soils. CRC Press; 2019.

27. Yan changrong: The basic situation of agricultural plastic film application in China and the effect of plastic film on soil and agricultural production (Chinese). Available online: https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_18374301 (accessed on 1 February 2025).

28. De Souza-Machado AA, Horton AA, Davis T, et al. Microplastics and their effects on soil function as a life-supporting system. In: Microplastics in Terrestrial Environments—Emerging Contaminants and Major Challenges, 3rd ed. Springer; 2020. pp. 199–222.

29. Pathan SI, Arfaioli P, Bardelli T, et al. Soil Pollution from Micro- and Nanoplastic Debrits: A Hidden and Unknown Biohazaed. Sustainability. 2020; 12(18): 7255. doi: 10.3390/su12187255

30. Peña A, Rodríguez-Liébana JA, Delgado-Moreno L. Interactions of Microplastics with Pesticides in Soils and Their Ecotoxicological Implications. Agronomy. 2023; 13(3): 701.

31. Sajjad M, Huang Q, Khan S, et al. Microplastics in the soil environment: A critical review. Environmental Technology & Innovation. 2022; 27: 102408. doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2022.102408

32. Insam H. Soil volatile organic compounds as tracers for microbial activities in soils. In: Omics in Soil Science, 2nd ed. Caister Academic Press; 2014. pp. 127–138.

33. Serrano A, Gallego M. Sorption study of 25 volatile organic compounds in several Mediterranean soils using headspace-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A. 2006; 1118(2): 261–270.

34. Khan TF, Rabbani MMG. Microplastic Impacts on Greenhouse Gases Emissions in Terrestrial Ecosystems. Open Journal of Soil Science. 2024; 14(1): 64–80. doi: 10.4236/ojss.2024.141004

35. de Souza Machado AA, Lau CW, Till J, et al. Impacts of microplastics on the soil biophysical environment. Environmental Science & Technology. 2018; 52(17): 9656–9665. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b02212

36. Leifheit EF, Lehmann A, Rillig MC. Potential effects of microplastic on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2021; 12. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.626709

37. Giambalvo D, Amato G, Ingraffia R, et al. Nitrogen fertilization and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi do not mitigate the adverse effects of soil contamination with polypropylene microfibers on maize growth. Environmental Pollution. 2023; 334: 122146. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122146

38. Kanold E, Buchanan SW, Dunfield K, Antunes PM. Microplastic additions modulate intraspecific variability in root traits and mycorrhizal responses across root‐life history strategies. Functional Ecology. 2024; 38(11): 2369–2377.

39. Lo Porto A, Amato G, Gargano G, et al. Polypropylene microfibers negatively affect soybean growth and nitrogen fixation regardless of soil type and mycorrhizae presence. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2024; 480: 135781. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135781

40. Kanold E, Buchanan SW, Tosi M, et al. Addition of polyester microplastic fibers to soil alters the diversity and abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and affects plant growth and nutrition. European Journal of Soil Biology. 2024; 122: 103666. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2024.103666

41. Chen H, Zhang X, Wang H, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi can inhibit the allocation of microplastics from crop roots to aboveground edible parts. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2023; 71(47): 18323–18332. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c05570

42. Perri SYU, Fernández MVV, Scotti A, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi with different life strategies in an ancient and abandoned Pb-Zn-Ag mine in Andes Mountain. Available online: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4320040/v1 (accessed on 1 February 2025).

43. Utge Perri SY, Valerga Fernández MV, Scotti A, et al. Responses of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant communities to long-term mining and passive restoration. Plants. 2025; 14(4): 580. doi: 10.3390/plants14040580

44. Ren A, Mickan BS, Li J, et al. Soil labile organic carbon sequestration is tightly correlated with the abundance and diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in semiarid maize fields. Land Degradation & Development. 2021; 32(3): 1224–1236. doi: 10.1002/ldr.3773

45. Gupta ML, Gupta A, Kumar P. Urbanization and biodiversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi- the case study of Delhi, India. Revista de Biología Tropical. 2018; 66(4). doi: 10.15517/rbt.v66i4.33216

46. Sun Y, Umer M, Wu P, et al. Indigenous microorganisms offset the benefits of growth and nutrition regulated by inoculated arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for four pioneer herbs in karst soil. PLoS One. 2022; 17(4): e0266526. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266526

47. Djighaly PI, Ngom D, Diagne N, et al. Effect of casuarina plantations inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and frankia on the diversity of herbaceous vegetation in saline environments in senegal. Diversity. 2020; 12(8): 293. doi: 10.3390/d12080293

48. Zhu D, Xiu-Li A, Qingli C, et al. Exposure of soil collembolans to microplastics perturbs their gut microbiota and alters their isotopic composition. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2018; 116: 302–310.

49. Kim D, Cui R, Moon J, Kwak J, An YJ. Soil ecotoxicity study of DEHP with respect to multiple soil species. Chemosphere. 2019; 216: 387–395.

50. Kiyama Y, Miyahara K, Ohshima Y. Active uptake of artificial particles in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. The Journal of Experimental Biology. 2012; 215(7): 1178–1183.

51. Lei L, Lui M, Song Y, et al. Polystyrene (nano)microplastics cause size-dependent neurotoxicity, oxidative damage and other adverse effects in Caenorhabditis elegans. Environmental Science: Nano. 2018; 5(8): 2009–2020.

52. Huerta Lwanga E, Gertsen H, Gooren H, et al. Microplastics in the terrestrial ecosystem: implications for Lumbricus terrestris (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae). Environmental Science & Technology. 2016; 50(5): 2685–2691.

53. Lwanga EH, Vega JM, Quej VK, et al. Field evidence for transfer of plastic debris along a terrestrial food chain. Scientific Reports. 2017; 7.

54. Rillig MC. Microplastic disguising as soil carbon storage. Environmental Science & Technology. 2018; 52(11): 6079.

55. Zhu BK, Fang YM, Zhu D, et al. Exposure to nanoplastics disturbs the gut microbiome in the soil oligochaete Enchytraeus crypticus. Environmental Pollution. 2018; 239: 408–415.

56. Steinmetz Z, Wollmann C, Schaefer M, et al. Plastic mulching in agriculture: Trading short-term agronomic benefits for long-term soil degradation. Science of The Total Environment. 2016; 550: 690–705.

57. Chen Y, Leng Y, Liu X, et al. Microplastic pollution in vegetable farmlands of suburb Wuhan, central China. Environmental Pollution. 2020; 257: 113449. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113449

58. Liu M, Lu S, Song Y, et al. Microplastic and mesoplastic pollution in farmland soil in suburbs of Shangai, China. Environmental Pollution. 2018; 242: 855–862.

59. Harms IK, Diekötter T, Tröger S, Lenz M. Amount, distribution, and composition of large microplastics in typical agricultural soils in Northern Germany. Sci Total Environ. Science of The Total Environment. 2021; 758: 143615. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143615

60. Piehl S, Leibner A, Loder MGJ, et al. Identification and quantification of macro- and microplastics on an agricultural farmland. Scientific Reports. 2018; 8: 17950.

61. Scarascia-Mugnozza G, Sica C, Russo G. Plastic materials in European agriculture: Actual use and perspectives. Journal of Agricultural Engineering. 2011; 42(3): 15–28. doi: 10.4081/jae.2011.3.15

62. Liebezeit G, Liebezeit E. Non-pollen particulates in honey and sugar. Food Additives & Contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, Analysis, Control, Exposure & Risk Assessment. 2013; 30(12): 2136–2140.

63. Liebezeit G, Liebezeit E. Origin of synthetic particles in honeys. Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences. 2015; 65(2): 143–147.

64. Sanders LC, Lord EM. Directed movement of latex-particles in the gynoecia of three species of flowering plants. Science. 1989; 243(4898): 1606–1608. doi: 10.1126/science.243.4898.1606

65. Ma X, Geiser-Lee J, Deng Y, Kolmakov A. Interactions between engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) and plants: Phytotoxicity, uptake and accumulation. Science of The Total Environment. 2010; 408(16): 3053–3061.

66. Giorgetti L, Spano C, Muccifora S, et al. Exploring the interaction between polystyrene nanoplastics and Allium cepa during germination: Internalization in root cells, induction of toxicity and oxidative stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2020; 149: 170–177.

67. Halfar J, Brožová K, Čabanová K, et al. Disparities in methods used to determine microplastics in the aquatic environment: a review of legislation, sampling process and instrumental analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(14): 7608. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147608

68. Corradini F, Casado F, Leiva V, et al. Microplastics occurrence and frequency in soils under different land uses on a regional scale. Science of The Total Environment. 2021; 752: 141917. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141917

69. Pérez-de-Luque A. Interaction of nanomaterials with plants: What do we need for real applications in agriculture. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2017; 5: 12. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2017.00012

70. Asli S, Neumann PM. Colloidal suspensions of clay or titanium dioxide nanoparticles can inhibit leaf growth and transpiration via physical effects on root water transport. Plant, cell & environment. 2009; 32(5): 577–584.

71. Bosker T, Bouwman LJ, Brun NR, et al. Microplastics accumulate on pores in seed capsule and delay germination and root growth of the terrestrial vascular plant Lepidium sativum. Chemosphere. 2019; 226: 774–781.

72. Mateos-Cardenas A, van Pelt FNAM, O’Halloran J, Jansen MAK. Adsorption, uptake and toxicity of micro- and nanoplastics: Effects on terrestrial plants and aquatic macrophytes. Environmental Pollution. 2021; 284: 117183. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117183

73. Boots B, Russell CW, Senga D. Green effects of microplastics in soil ecosystems: Above and below ground. Environmental Science & Technology. 2019; 53(19): 11496–11506. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b03304

74. Potters G, Pasternak TP, Guisez Y, et al. Stress-induced morphogenic responses: Growing out of trouble. Trends in Plant Science. 2007; 12(3): 98–105.

75. Lozano YM, Rillig MC. Effects of microplastic fibers and drought on plant communities. Environmental Science & Technology. 2020; 54(10): 6166–6173.

76. Zhu R, Zhang Z, Zhang N, et al. A global estimate of multiecosystem photosynthesis losses under microplastic pollution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2025; 122(11). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2423957122

77. van der Veen I, van Mourik LM, van Velzen JM, et al. Plastic particles in livestock feed, milk, meat and blood. Environment & Health. 2022.

78. Weithmann N, Moller JN, Loder MGJ, et al. Organic fertilizer as a vehicle for the entry of microplastic into the environment. Science Advances. 2018; 4(4).

79. Franzellitti S, Canesi L, Auguste M, et al. Microplastic exposure and effects in aquatic organisms: A physiological perspective. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2019; 68: 37–51.

80. Egbeocha CO, Malek S, Emenike CU, et al. Feasting on microplastics: Ingestion by and effects on marine organisms. Aquatic Biology. 2018; 27: 93–106.

81. Fred-Ahmadu OH, Bhagwat G, Oluyoye I, et al. Interaction of chemical contaminants with microplastics: principles and perspectives. Science of The Total Environment. 2020; 706: 135978. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135978

82. Hu L, Zhou Y, Wang Y, et al. Transfer of micro(nano)plastics in animals: A mini-review and future research recommendation. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances. 2022; 7: 100101. doi: 10.1016/j.hazadv.2022.100101

83. Ramachandraiah K, Ameer K, Jiang G, Hong GP. Micro- and nanoplastic contamination in livestock production: Entry pathways, potential effects and analytical challenges. The Science of The Total Environment. 2022; 844: 157234. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157234

84. Gerbens-Leenes PW, Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY. The water footprint of poultry, pork, and beef: a comparative study in different countries and production systems. Water Resources and Industry. 2013; 1–2: 25–36. doi: 10.1016/j.wri.2013.03.001

85. Gijzen HJ, Lubberding HJ, Verhagen FJ, et al. Application of rumen microorganisms for an enhanced anaerobic degradation of solid organic waste materials. Biological Wastes. 1987; 22(2): 81–95.

86. Mahadappa P, Krishnaswamy N, Karunanidhi M, et al. Effect of plastic foreign body impaction on rumen function and heavy metal concentrations in various body fluids and tissues of buffaloes. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2020; 189: 109972. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109972

87. Meyer G, Puig-Lozano R, Fernández A. Anthropogenic litter in terrestrial flora and fauna: Is the situation as bad as in the ocean? A field study in Southern Germany on five meadows and 150 ruminants in comparison with marine debris. Environmental Pollution. 2023; 323: 121304.

88. Martín Martel S, Morales M, Morales I, et al. Pathological Changes of the Rumen in Small Ruminants Associated with Indigestible Foreign Objects. Ruminants. 2021; 1(2): 118–126.

89. Priyanka M, Dey S. Ruminal impaction due to plastic materials—An increasing threat to ruminants and its impact on human health in developing countries. Veterinary world. 2018; 11(9): 1307–1315.

90. Beriot N, Peek J, Zornoza R, et al. Low-density microplastics detected in sheep feces and soil: a case study from intensive vegetable farming in Southeast Spain. Science of The Total Environment. 2021; 755: 142653. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142653

91. Ngoshe AA. Incidence of polythene bag ingestion by ruminant animals at Maiduguri Central Abattoir. Ramat Journal of Management, Science and Technology. 2012; 1(2): 12–16.

92. Tiruneh R, Yesuwork H. Occurrence of foreign bodies in sheep and goats slaughtered at the Addis Ababa municipal abattoir. Ethiopian Veterinary Journal. 2010; 14(1): 91–100.

93. Ramaswamy V, Rai Sharma H. Plastic bags—Threat to environment and cattle health: A retrospective study from Gondar city of Ethiopia. IIOAB Journal. 2011; 2(1): 6–10.

94. Perez-Guevara F, Kutralam-Muniasamy G, Shruti VC. Critical review on microplastics in fecal matter: Research progress, analytical methods and future outlook. Science of The Total Environment. 2021; 778: 146395. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146395

95. Huston JE, Rector BS, Ellis WC, Allen ML. Dynamics of digestion in cattle, sheep, goats, and deer. Journal of animal science. 1986; 62(1): 208–215. doi: 10.2527/jas1986.621208x

96. Sheehan KL, Lawson P, Emerson B. Fate of plastics in cattle digestive systems. Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health. 2022; 28(4): 205–214.

97. Wu RT, Cai YF, Chen YX, et al. Occurrence of microplastic in livestock and poultry manure in South China. Environmental Pollution. 2021; 277: 116790. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116790

98. Sun Y, Ren X, Pan J, et al. Effect of microplastics on greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions during aerobic composting. Science of The Total Environment. 2020; 737: 139856. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139856

99. Zhou Y, Sun Y, Liu J, et al. Effects of microplastics on humification and fungal community during cow manure composting. Science of The Total Environment. 2022; 803: 150029. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150029

100. Sheriff I, Yusoff MS, Abd Manan TSB, et al. Microplastics in manure: Sources, analytical methods, toxicodynamic, and toxicokinetic endpoints in livestock and poultry. Environmental Advances. 2023; 12: 100372. doi: 10.1016/j.envadv.2023.100372

101. Breuer NE, Fraisse CW. Climate services for agricultural and livestock producers: What have we learned. Agrometeoros. 2020; 18: 28.

102. Burgess K. Milk and Dairy Products in Human Nutrition (2013), by E.Muehlhoff, A.Bennett and D.McMahon, Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO), Rome. E-ISBN: 978-92-5-107864-8 (PDF). Available on web-site (publications-sales@fao.org). International Journal of Dairy Technology. 2014; 67(2): 303–304. doi: 10.1111/1471-0307.12124

103. Frazzoli C, Grasso G, Husaini DC, et al. Immune system and epidemics: The role of African indigenous bioactive substances. Nutrients. 2023; 15(2): 273. doi: 10.3390/nu15020273

104. Andrady AL. The plastic in microplastics: A review. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2017; 119(1): 12–22.

105. Da Costa Filho PA, Andrey D, Eriksen B, et al. Detection and characterization of small‐sized microplastics (≥ 5 μm) in milk products. Scientific Reports. 2021; 11: 24046.

106. Kutralam-Muniasamy G, Pérez-Guevara F, Elizalde-Martínez I, Shruti VC. Branded milks–Are they immune from microplastics contamination. Science of The Total Environment. 2020; 714: 136823. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136823

107. Tomasula PN, Bonnaillie LM. Cross flow microfiltration in the dairy industry. In: Datta N, Tomasula PM (editors). Emerging Dairy Processing Technologies: Opportunities for the Dairy Industry. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2015; pp. 1–31.

108. Diaz-Basantes MF, Juan A, Conesa JA, et al. Microplastics in honey, beer, milk and refreshments in Ecuador as emerging contaminants. Sustainability. 2020; 12(14): 5514. doi: 10.3390/su12145514

109. Zhang Q, Liu L, Jiang Y, et al. Microplastics in infant milk powder. Environmental Pollution. 2023; 323: 121225. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121225

110. Visentin E, Manuelian CL, Niero G, et al. Characterization of microplastics in skim-milk powders. Journal of Dairy Science. 2024; 107(8): 5393–5401.

111. Di Fiore C, Carriera F, Paris E, et al. First approach for defining an analytical protocol for the determination of microplastics in cheese by Py-GC-MS. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4620447 (accessed on 1 February 2025).

112. Kiruba R, Preethi M, Aganasteen R, et al. Identification of microplastics as emerging contaminants in branded milk of Tamil Nadu State, India. Asian Journal of Biological and Life Sciences. 2022; 11(1): 181.

113. Wang F, Wong CS, Chen D, et al. Interaction of toxic chemicals with microplastics: A critical review. Water Research. 2018; 139: 208–219.

114. Robertson I. Optimizing the workflow for FTIR microspectroscopy of microplastics present in environmental samples. Microscopy and Microanalysis. 2018; 24(S1): 598–599.

115. Kwon JH, Kim JW, Pham TP, et al. Microplastics in Food: A Review on Analytical Methods and Challenges. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(18): 6710. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186710

Downloads

Published

06/26/2025

Issue

Section

Review

How to Cite

Micro(nano)plastics cycle in ruminant farming systems. (2025). Progress in Environmental Chemistry, 1(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.65746/pec63